June 16 (UPI) — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a Christian-based pregnancy center’s request, challenging New Jersey over its claim the pro-life group misled women about offering abortion services.
The Supreme Court will decide later this year whether First Choice Women’s Resource Centers can use federal courts to block the state’s attorney general from investigating its donor, advertising and medical personnel records.
First Choice, which provides parenting classes and free ultrasounds to women facing unplanned pregnancies, claims a 2023 subpoena violated its free speech rights.
Attorney General Matthew Platkin “has made no secret of his hostility towards pregnancy centers,” the pro-life group wrote in its petition to the Supreme Court, as it called Platkin’s subpoena “invasive” for demanding access to records.
“State attorneys general on both sides of the political aisle have been accused of misusing this authority to issue demands against their ideological and political opponents,” lawyers for First Choice wrote. “Even if these accusations turn out to be false, it is important that a federal forum exists for suits challenging those investigative demands.”
Platkin argues that the subpoena he issued has yet to be enforced in state court. He also said the donor information he sought was from two websites, which he claimed may have misled people into thinking First Choice provided abortions.
“Nonprofits, including crisis pregnancy centers, may not deceive or defraud residents in our state, and we may exercise our traditional investigative authority to ensure that they are not doing so — as we do to protect New Jerseyans from a range of harms,” Platkin wrote in a statement.
The Supreme Court will focus on whether First Choice sued prematurely, not whether New Jersey’s subpoena was valid, according to Platkin.
“First Choice is looking for a special exception from the usual procedural rules as it tries to avoid complying with an entirely lawful state subpoena,” Platkin added. “No industry is entitled to that type of special treatment — period.”
Lawyers for First Choice said the group is not seeking special treatment and believes their free speech rights are being targeted.
“New Jersey’s attorney general is targeting First Choice simply because of its pro-life views,” Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Erin Hawley said in a statement. “The Constitution protects First Choice and its donors from unjustified demands to disclose their identities, and First Choice is entitled to vindicate those rights in federal court.”
Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for October.
“We are looking forward to presenting our case to the Supreme Court and urging it to hold that First Choice has the same right to federal court as any other civil rights plaintiff,” Hawley added.
“The First Amendment protects First Choice’s right to freely speak about its beliefs, exercise its faith, associate with like-minded individuals and organizations, and continue to provide its free services in a caring and compassionate environment to people facing unplanned pregnancies.”